DANA GREENE’S CHOICE of subtitle for her biography of British poet Elizabeth Jennings was inspired. It got here from Marianne Moore, who took it from a Gerard Manley Hopkins poem; Jennings extensively utilized it because the title for one in every of her many autobiographies. It could have been even greater stimulated to make “War” plural, in order to seize the diverse battles of Jennings’s soul and mind: lust as opposed to Catholic orthodoxy; alienation as opposed to loneliness; arrogance as opposed to alcoholism and compulsiveness.
One must recognize Greene’s skills for organizing the disarray of Jennings’s existence into a cohesive narrative. Her difficulty’s astonishingly prolific output complex the project; Jennings wrote and edited 48 posted books — by and large poetry but also biographies, autobiographies, criticism, and essays. What is more superb is that her posted works are most effective a small fraction of what she produced. Greene describes many manic writing binges, which includes one in which Jennings wrote 192 poems in 30 days.
The inclusion of Jennings as the sole woman a few of the younger British poets who became called “the Movement” adds similarly trouble. This characterization first appeared in an nameless 1954 Spectator piece written by way of the paper’s literary editor, J. D. Scott, and it has always been arguable. Greene characterizes the Movement as “a faux category,” and Jennings herself known as it “a journalistic gimmick.”
Despite those objections, Scott’s essay made a reasonable case. He stated that Philip Larkin, Kingsley Amis, and John Wain — all Oxford poets — shared a commonplace taste for formal verse and accessibility whilst rejecting what they noticed as the excesses of recent and contemporary poets, particularly Dylan Thomas. Before lengthy, the Movement’s “membership” multiplied to include D. J. Enright, Donald Davie, Thom Gunn, John Holloway, Robert Conquest, and Elizabeth Jennings. While they did not meet as a group — and a number of them can also never have met at all — it’s far tough to dispute the statement that Oxford became all at once producing gifted young poets with many similarities in cultural attitudes and literary fashion.
Greene’s over-the-top contempt for poets of the Movement undermines her objectivity and credibility as a biographer. She calls them “boozing blokes” and incorrectly tars them all in this fashion: “Their worldview changed into provincial, agnostic and politically noncommittal. They had been Little Englanders who were sometime crass and debunking.” This invective comes off as an amateurish application of these days’s ideologies to every other era, no longer as a cautious evaluation of literary history. Conquest, as an instance, became infrequently apolitical — he became additionally a historian who did a great deal to open the eyes of government officials and lecturers each to the atrocities devoted by means of the Soviet Union in the Nineteen Thirties and the persevering with danger that the Soviet Union posed to democracies round the sector. It is also weird for Greene to sentence all the male Movement poets for “boozing” while she affords this kind of sympathetic account of Jennings’s alcoholism, which have become so intense that it subsequently led to her institutionalized rehabilitation.
The predominant arc of Jennings’s existence in all fairness truthful, however the many oscillations along that arc are messy. Jennings changed into born in 1926 to upper-center-elegance Catholic dad and mom who lived within the small rural town of Boston in Lincolnshire. This time within the countryside became the happiest part of Jennings’s existence, and as she elderly, she viewed it as an increasing number of idyllic.
Expulsion from Eden befell in 1932, while the Jennings own family moved to Oxford, a jolt from which Jennings by no means emotionally recovered, even though she began to make friends who would help her and her literary career. One of her earliest Oxford buddies turned into Priscilla Tolkien, the daughter of the famed professor and creator. Priscilla persevered to stand via Jennings all her existence, at the same time as the poet wore out the persistence of almost everyone round her.
Jennings attended a number of schools in Oxford, and people witnessed few of her later dysfunctional trends. Inspired to start with by way of G. K. Chesterton — a traditional version for young poets of that technology — she started out writing poetry, almost compulsively. Another decisive improvement passed off when she became 15; for Jennings, puberty initiated a tremendous lifelong war among her intensely lustful dreams and the tenets of her “cradle Catholicism.”
In 1944, at the age of 18, she entered the University of Oxford, wherein she to begin with struggled academically, but went directly to achieve Second Class honors. She also — very warily — started courting. In the summer of 1947 she became engaged to “Stuart.” Jennings provided conflicting statements about the eventual breakup of this dating, as does Greene, but it appears probable that her father’s opposition become the important thing obstacle. Greene has this to mention approximately “Stuart”: “He was a Keble guy who turned into seven years her senior, former prisoner of warfare in Japan, a poet, and a Buddhist.” Despite this wealth of precise information, there may be no proof in her notes that Greene made any attempt to identify “Stuart” to be able to research more approximately this key relationship from another perspective.
The college uncovered her to the top poets of that time and to folks who could turn out to be pinnacle poets in the future. She dutifully observed C. S. Lewis’s recommendation in a lecture to read Plato. She additionally met Kingsley Amis, who Greene admits “could have an critical function in advancing her as a poet.” Jennings changed into certainly advancing unexpectedly as a developing wide variety of her poems seemed in print in prestigious journals.
Like many graduating seniors, Jennings became relatively at a loss to recognise what to do next. And so, like many graduating seniors, she punted and asked her father for help; he paid for some other year at Oxford in order that she ought to pursue an ill-fated venture on Matthew Arnold. Her first process after Oxford become even greater of a catastrophe:
Using her father’s contacts, she subsequently secured a position as assistant librarian at the Oxford City library […] her agenda become stressful and rigid and her profits minimal at £6 consistent with week. Her work consisted in finding out and shelving books and occasionally manning the reference table. At times, she have become indignant with library purchasers. Once, in a fury, she retreated to the basement and flung a chair across the room, smashing it to bits.
Before lengthy she took a journey to Rome, which converted her from a perfunctory “cradle Catholic” to a passionate member of her faith.
After returning from Rome she determined to leave the library and take the formidable step of creating her residing as a author. It is a tribute to her industriousness, and her capacity to show on her appeal whilst essential, that she survived for a brief time with bills for poems, critiques, and articles — in addition to aid from customers of the humanities. A few months later, she received an unexpected offer of an access-level activity at the London writer Chatto & Windus. Jennings plunged into the paintings, and even greater into the London literary scene, but, after a 12 months, burned out and returned to Oxford as a complete-time author.
Jennings’s reputation persevered to upward push inside the United Kingdom, but American critics and readers largely left out her. Despite her awards and prestigious publications, her behavior became intermittently more paranoid and erratic. She was institutionalized several instances and attempted suicide as a minimum two times, as soon as with the aid of looking to gas herself in an oven quickly after Sylvia Plath’s death. She endured to write at an laborious tempo even when institutionalized; for one among her many Carcanet books she asked its lengthy-suffering founder, Michael Schmidt, to choose her high-quality from amongst one thousand poems.
Despite her self-destructive behavior and indiscriminately prolific writing, in 1992 Jennings acquired the medal of the Commander of the British Empire from Queen Elizabeth. The following 12 months, she become homeless for an extended stretch and published notices at newsstands that examine, “Elizabeth Jennings has nowhere to live. Can you assist?” When she died, her diminished circle of pals overlooked all her instructions for her funeral.
There is lots to have fun on this biography. Dana Greene has averted the temptation to savage her situation as Lawrance Thompson did Robert Frost and Andrew Motion did Philip Larkin. Unlike recent biographers of Elizabeth Bishop, Robert Lowell, and Richard Wilbur, she has largely kept her very own ego out of her paintings. Most importantly, she has introduced order to the disorder of Jennings’s life and punctiliously documented it.
The e-book does have shortcomings. The prose often deteriorates at some stage in discussions of sex or politics. For instance, Greene describes some of Jennings’s erotic poetry as “congruent with and descriptive of the activities of her lifestyles” with out in addition clarification. Greene also gives us with this clumsy sentence about Jennings’s poems on abortion, wherein she seems to confuse “views” with “views”: “In those she expresses an expansion of perspectives: of a girl advocated to have an abortion, a man accepting being pregnant as evidence of ardour, a girls complicit with an abortion, and every other woman who refuses it.” She gives no real analyses of those poems, and she or he sniffily dismisses Jennings’s political verse as “simplistic” and “naïve” without offering proof to help this sweeping condemnation.
A large trouble with Greene’s method is that she perspectives Jennings’s poetry frequently as records approximately her lifestyles. She nearly by no means affords private perception into the poems, but alternatively fees critics to make something factor approximately Jennings’s existence she feels is warranted. As a end result, the ebook never shows us why many critics don’t forget Elizabeth Jennings to be an finished formalist or why she may be the greatest non secular poet of the second one half of of the 20 th century — it genuinely gives the punditry of others to make the declare. In different words, the writer neglected an vital opportunity to show readers who are unusual with Jennings’s work why there has been a need for this biography.
Despite those reservations, it is good to have a cogent telling of the Jennings tale in order to function a part of the foundation for the eventual definitive biography.